RON MALY HAS BEEN WATCHING THE PARADE GO BY FOR A LONG TIME. THIS IS ONE OF HIS WEBSITES.
Monday, March 31, 2014
A Flawed Project
By RON MALY
I don't spend much time reading the paper these days, but I did happen to scan the comments from readers on page 2 of Sunday's sports section regarding what went wrong with Iowa's 2013-2014 basketball team.
I have some thoughts about those comments and the entire project.
First of all, I don't think it was a good idea for the editors to ask readers for their opinions on what went haywire with the Big Ten Conference team.
But the editors did ask readers for their thoughts, and they got basically the same type of stuff that appears on the many fan websites that are on the Internet.
At least the paper is trying to make us believe that the people quoted in Sunday's project used their correct names, not the phony names that appear on the fan sites.
A much better idea at the paper would have been to assign a writer to a project in which he or she would have interviewed people who know basketball--guys like the retired Tom Davis and other former coaches and players who have gone into broadcasting, such as Seth Greenberg, Bobby Knight, Doug Gottlieb, Dan Dakich and Dick Vitale.
It was the outspoken Dakich who, on telecasts of Hawkeye games, was particularly critical of the team during its late-season swoon.
Dakich consistently raved about all the talent on Iowa's roster, but said a lack of communication was one of the reasons the Hawkeyes were having problems in the final weeks.
I'd like to know what "lack of communication" means when it comes to a major-college basketball team. I guess I'll have to call Dakich myself to find out.
People who have coached and played the game would have given the paper's readers a much better handle on what the Hawkeyes' problems were, instead of what fans thought.
Who knows, maybe some of those "fans" who were quoted are fans of teams other than Iowa.
As for the people who contributed to the paper's story, I certainly hope somebody in the department checked their identities.
I mean, there were some far-away hometowns listed for a number of those who did the commenting. Like Kfar Saba, Israel, Tucson and Sun City West in Arizona, Beverly Hills, Fla., Fort Wayne, Ind., Lansing, Mich., and San Antonio, TX.
I assume those people read the paper on their computers and emailed their comments to the editors. I doubt they subscribe to the print edition.
All of those types of comments are supposed to be checked and re-checked by editors to see if the letter-writers and email-writers are actually who they say they are, and I hope that was done because people who still work in the sports department are well aware of cases when readers have used phony names, and gotten by with it, to make a point in letters to the editor.
Those letters are not supposed to be like My 2 Cents Worth, the garbage that is published in the front [news] section of the paper. People use phony names--there's one signed "Burp" in today's paper--in that feature, and the paper promotes junk like that.
I also thought it was interesting in the paper's page 2 sports project that there was some massive editing of the responses.
Someone named Dr. Craig Nadler of Kfar Saba, Israel was quoted on page 2 this way: "Most big teams are rugged and have attitude. We have oodles of talent on our team but we seem to lack that rugged, aggressive attitude on the whole."
Oodles of talent? Man, I haven't heard the term oodles in a long, long time.
I checked the online version of what Nadler wrote, and found a much longer text. Here it is in its entirety:
"Like most Hawkeye fans, I have spent lots of thought trying to understand why things turned so sour in such a short time. Sports editor Chad Leistikow is right: There are no obvious explanations for all of us on the outside looking in.
"But nothing that happened this year changes my opinion that Fran McCaffery is a very talented and terrific coach. I have listened to him carefully and he is clearly a hard worker, passionate about his task and extremely skilled. So what went wrong?
"I did not see signs of problems with team chemistry or locker-room issues. Not having been inside, I cannot be sure but the players’ demeanor always seemed to convey a mutual liking and respect amongst the players and with their coaches. I did not sense panic on the coaches’ part and, hence, do not believe panic filtered to the players from above.
"There are two explanations that seem likely. The first has to do with team and individual psychological factors. Anyone who plays or has played sports knows how important self-belief is.
"When a few players start to lose that self belief, it can spread. My guess is that there was a combination of fatigue and self-doubt that begin to affect the team after the losses to Wisconsin and Minnesota. It just seems to have spread. In competition, when the opponent senses that self-doubt, his confidence grows, which seemed to happen to our opposition as they began shooting with amazing proficiency and confidence.
"The second factor has to do with how our team is built. Most big teams are rugged and have attitude. We have oodles of talent on our team but we seem to lack that rugged, aggressive attitude, on the whole. For example, those who are veteran fans like me will remember Jeff Moe and Bill Jones. More recently, we had Jeff Horner and Greg Brunner. Another example was Brody Boyd. These players had an attitude and knew the ball was going in if they shot it.
"During coach McCaffery’s time as head coach, it has seemed that he has constantly searched for the player to take that last shot. Devyn Marble was terrific and was not afraid. But he was not that player with attitude and grit who was going to score, no matter what. It is not a matter of skill. The player I remember best exemplifying those attributes was Scott Skiles of Michigan State. He was extraordinary. If the game came down to one shot he was going to be the one taking it and more likely than not, making it.
"My hope is that coach McCaffery is searching for players of Skiles’ ilk. I really feel that is what we need to complete the puzzle and get us through these tough stretches."
— Dr. Craig Nadler, Kfar Saba, Israel
If the texts submitted by the other writers were sliced and diced to that extent, I'd say it's another reason the project wasn't worth it.
Anyway, judging by the names of the ex-Hawkeyes brought up by Nadler, I guess he's been watching Iowa basketball for a long time.
Heck, I didn't know the Big Ten Network's signal was so strong that it carries into Israel.
Another thing. If I were a reporter or columnist in the sports department of the paper these days, I would be mad as hell that the editors chose to invite readers to comment on why the Hawkeyes had one of the biggest late-season collapses in Big Ten Conference basketball history.
The paper spent a ton of money sending reporters and columnists to Iowa [and Iowa State] basketball games this season, and those reporters and columnists are supposed to know what they're doing and they're expected to identify what went wrong and why things went wrong with the teams they covered.
It shouldn't be left to fans off the street and emailers to do an autopsy for the paper on the Hawkeyes after they lost seven of their last eight games.
Yet, I can't recall any newspaper reporter or columnist from this state writing during that maddening late-season slide that the coach was the problem.
However, someone identified as Frank Copple of Sun City West, AZ, wrote in yesterday's paper: "I feel the majority of the blame goes on the coach..."
Sportswriters and sports columnists who work for newspapers these days don't hold coaches accountable for what goes wrong with teams.
I know a thing or two about holding coaches [Lute Olson, Ray Nagel, Frank Lauterbur, Jim Walden, Jim Criner, Bob Ortegel and Ken Trickey among them] accountable, and I never felt I was doing my job if I didn't.
But sportswriters and sports columnists these days obviously want to stay on the positive, chummy side of the coaches they cover.
The reason is simple.
Those writers and columnists are fearful of losing their jobs when times get tough financially in the newsroom, which seems to always be the case now.
Fired sports columnists and writers at the paper such as Sean Keeler, Mark Emmert, Dan McCool and Dan Johnson can tell you all about that.
At best, asking readers to write about a team's problems was a somewhat interesting project. But, face it, we don't know any more about what caused Iowa to go 1-7 in its last eight games than we knew a week ago.
However, maybe this idea of asking fans for their opinions on why teams can't win will continue.
Perhaps next season when the Hawkeyes aren't doing well, the editors will take the next step and tell the sportswriters and columnists to stay home, with this explanation: "We're asking readers to write the story about the next game. They'll watch it on TV, then email us with their comments. We're sending you guys to a high school game."
Don't laugh.
The way the newspaper business is going, anything can happen.