Another message from Richard Hayman:
Hello, Mr. Maly,
It is great to hear from you. I’ve missed our correspondence…mostly my fault, I guess. I thought I was taking a break from teaching while working on my doctorate in educational leadership, but I’ve taken on some “part-time” teaching responsibilities at the university that, naturally, are more demanding than just part-time. I still don’t know what I will be when I grow up but, I can say that as I approach my first school district superintendency, I am excited about the possibilities. Meanwhile, my baby boy has grown up into a young man. I’ve tried to talk him into letting me be his college roommate, but he’ll have nothing to do with it. The kids grow up so fast, and it has been the unexpected and overwhelmingly joyful opportunity to be a dad that has added the most meaning to my life.
I agree
with Al (the Health Nut), I like your idea about Iowa-Iowa State twice
per season…preferably in back-to-back weekends! That would certainly set
our intrastate rivalry apart from any others. It’s actually a really
good idea. I suppose some would say, “…with well over a hundred teams
from which to choose, you’re crazy for playing the same team twice in a
season”, and, at times, that argument would have merit. But, if both
programs are competitive in their neighboring, and rival, power
conferences, I think it would be just absolutely terrific. The intrigue
of the second game would always be compelling.
By
the way, I’ve given some more thought to my previous comments about the
Beathard to Powell touchdown…and I stick to my original position. In
fact, at the risk of going too far, I say that if the receiver has
possession of the ball before it touches the ground, even if
inadvertently stuck in his face mask, or miraculously spinning on his
prostrate body, then it is a catch. When someone banks in a free throw
or a 3-pointer, we don’t take those points off the board, arguing that
the player didn’t really mean to do it. We say he or she got lucky. Call
it slop, if you will. But, the points stay on the board. Teams have
lost important basketball games on a lucky shot, but no one argues that
the points should have been disallowed. That’s the way the ball bounces.
When a running back impossibly eludes a horde of would be tacklers,
bounced around like a pinball, unconscious on his feet, but somehow ends
up in the end zone, we don’t take those points off the board and spot
the ball where the runner should have been tackled. He got lucky.
A kick that bounces inward through the goal posts after colliding with
the upright…those points stay on the board. Even a made intentional-miss
free throw…the point stays on the board. Ball never touched the ground,
and the receiver had possession at the end of the play. Seems simple
enough to me.
Should be an interesting ballgame this weekend. I hope C.J. stays frosty. At some point, he is going
to get an opportunity to play for more than a single series. I believe
he has the potential to carry this team to a new level…especially with
the weapons we have this year. As ridiculous as it may sound, we
possibly have two NFL-caliber quarterbacks on our two-deep. I might
alternate them on a per game basis, giving my quarterback two weeks to
prepare for an opponent, while giving both guys the opportunity to play
that they deserve. It’s a wonderful problem to have, but it is a
problem…and one that demands a creative solution. Sooner, rather than
later.
Best regards,
-- richard