By RON MALY
This is another attempt in my ongoing campaign to improve the sorry-ass Monday health section of the paper.
The flimsy Monday paper is such a sadsack
Diseased heart, courtesy of WebMD |
Stories in the paper's health section are written by parttimers who either went to truck driving school or are between jobs as waitresses in the deli restaurants at Dahl's.
The stories they write consist of hard-hitting stuff like "It's Time To Inflate Your Bicycle Tires So You're Ready for RAGBRAI."
Instead of that type of crap, what those parttimers should do is interview three or four cardiologists to find out, and write about, how a 54-year-old guy could die while taking a walk with his wife [that's what it said in the man's obituary] or how 55-year-old Randy Brubaker could die two weeks after having a heart attack and receiving a stent to prevent another heart attack.
Such a project would fit in well with the paper because Brubaker worked there, and was well-liked and well-respected by some and not so well-liked and not so well-respected by others.
I'd like to know what cardiologists think happened to the guy taking the walk, or to Brubaker after he was treated for a heart attack.
I want to know why the stent placed in Brubaker's heart didn't save him.
I also want to know if Brubaker was advised to have coronary bypass surgery to correct his problem and, if not, why.
I also want to know why Brubaker was planning to come back to work just a couple of weeks after suffering the heart attack.
That seems too early to me.
And I also want to know if doctors would simply say, "It was just their time to go" when asked how people in their mid-50s can die so suddenly.
I'm sure there are cardiologists around town who would cooperate with such a project for a health section that, in my estimation, is the worst of any published by a metropolitan daily newspaper in the nation.
*
The paper picked the right guy to write the story this week about the newspaper editor from Newton who was canned for writing something in his personal blog.
The story was written by Daniel P. Finney, who knows all about getting in trouble with what he writes in his personal blog.
Finney was fired by the paper in St. Louis a few years ago for what he wrote in his blog about his editors and his assignments.
However, Finney didn't have the balls to use his own name on the blog. Instead, he used the name Roland H. Thompson.
Consequently, Daniel P. Finney and Roland H. Thompson will be forever linked at the hip and in other places in journalism circles.
I certainly hope Finney's bosses are keeping a close watch on what that clown is writing these days in his personal blog and emails, who he's attacking and whether he's using his own name or a phony name.